The Shocking Truth You Need to Know!
Hey there, wellness seekers! 🌟 Have you ever reached for brown sugar thinking it's the "healthier" choice for your morning coffee or baking? I recently overheard someone quip that brown sugar is just "dirty white sugar"—LOL, right? But is there truth to that?Â
As someone passionate about holistic health and energetic medicine, I dove deep into the research to debunk myths and uncover facts.Â
Spoiler: The sweet world of sugars isn't as black-and-white (or brown-and-white) as it seems. Let's break it down step by step, backed by science, so you can make empowered choices for your body and mind.
What Exactly Is Brown Sugar?
Brown sugar is essentially sucrose (the same as table sugar) derived from sugar cane or beets, but with a twist: it retains or has added back some molasses, that sticky byproduct from refining. This gives it that moist texture, caramel flavor, and signature color. There are types like light brown (less molasses) and dark brown (more), or even less-processed versions like turbinado or muscovado. But here's the kicker—most commercial brown sugar is made by mixing refined white sugar with molasses, not some magical unprocessed gem.
Now, about that "dirty white sugar" label? It's kinda spot-on in a cheeky way. The "dirtiness" refers to the molasses, which includes trace impurities like minerals, plant residues, and even tiny bits of the original cane. White sugar is ultra-refined to remove all that for purity, while brown keeps (or adds) it for flavor. No, it's not contaminated or unsafe—it's just less polished. But does this make it better for you? Let's see.
Is Brown Sugar Really Healthier Than White Sugar?
Short answer: Not really. Despite the hype, brown sugar isn't a significant upgrade over white. Both are added sugars that provide empty calories and can contribute to issues like weight gain, diabetes, and inflammation when overconsumed. Here's the science-backed lowdown:
- Nutritional Edge? Minimal at Best: Brown sugar has slightly more minerals thanks to molasses—think calcium (83 mg per 100g vs. 1 mg in white), iron, potassium, and magnesium. But these amounts are tiny; you'd need to eat cups of it to get any real benefit, which defeats the purpose!
- Calories and Glycemic Impact: Both pack about 16 calories per teaspoon and have a similar glycemic index (GI) around 65, meaning they spike blood sugar pretty much the same. No win for brown here.
- Health Risks: Studies show no major difference in how they affect health. One experiment even found that high consumption of either white or brown sugar impacts serum levels similarly, with no evidence brown is less damaging. For folks with diabetes or sensitivities, brown isn't a safer bet.
Bottom line? If you're swapping white for brown thinking it's a health hack, think again—it's more of a flavor choice than a nutritional one.
So, What's the Healthiest Form of Sugar?
No sugar is truly "healthy" in excess—the key is moderation (aim for under 6-9 teaspoons of added sugar daily, per health guidelines). But if you're looking for better alternatives, opt for less-processed options that retain natural nutrients, antioxidants, or fiber to slow absorption. Whole fruits are the ultimate winner since their sugars come packaged with fiber and vitamins. For sweeteners, here's a quick comparison table based on research:
Research shows unrefined options like honey or maple can offer minor perks like anti-inflammatory effects, but they're still sugars—use sparingly. Artificial substitutes? They're low-cal but mixed on long-term safety—stick to natural if possible.
Â
Artificial Sweeteners: An Overview
Artificial sweeteners, also known as non-nutritive sweeteners, are synthetic substances used to add sweetness to foods and beverages without the calories of sugar. They are commonly employed in diet products, for weight management, and by individuals with diabetes.
Cyclamates
Cyclamates (specifically sodium cyclamate), are artificial sweeteners derived from cyclamic acid. They were discovered in 1937 by graduate student Michael Sveda at the University of Illinois during research on an antipyretic drug; he accidentally tasted its sweetness after contaminating a cigarette. Initially patented by DuPont and later marketed by Abbott Laboratories, ciclamati gained GRAS (Generally Recognized as Safe) status from the FDA in 1958 and were used in tablets and liquids for diabetics due to their heat stability.
In terms of sweetness, ciclamati are 30–50 times sweeter than sucrose (table sugar), making them the least potent among major artificial sweeteners, but they offer good synergy when blended with others like saccarina. Chemically, they are salts of cyclohexanesulfamic acid, stable under heat, and soluble in water, which suits them for cooking and baking.
They are commonly used in dietary products, soft drinks, and baked goods, often in a 10:1 mixture with saccarina to mask bitter aftertastes. Brands like Sweet'n Low (in Canada) and Assugrin incorporate ciclamati. They are less expensive than alternatives like sucralosio.
Safety concerns arose in the 1960s and 1970s. A 1966 study showed intestinal bacteria could convert ciclamati to cyclohexylamine, potentially toxic, and a 1969 rat study linked a ciclamati-saccarina mixture to bladder cancer at high doses (equivalent to 550 diet sodas daily for humans). However, a 2000 monkey study found no carcinogenic link, and further assays showed no DNA damage. Potential health effects include debated risks of bladder cancer and toxicity, but the EU deems them safe.
Regulatory status varies: approved in over 130 countries, including the EU (re-approved in 1996 after a UK ban) and Canada, but banned in the US since 1970, South Korea, and Bangladesh due to cancer concerns. Controversies stem from the US ban, with unsuccessful petitions to lift it in 1980, highlighting global divides in safety interpretations.
Saccharin
Saccharin is one of the oldest artificial sweeteners, discovered in 1879 by chemist Constantin Fahlberg at Johns Hopkins University while researching coal tar derivatives; he noticed its sweetness by accident. Production began in Germany in the 1880s, and its use surged during World War I sugar shortages and in the 1960s–1970s for dieting. In the US, it's often sold in pink packets like Sweet'n Low.
It is approximately 500 times sweeter than sucrose but has a bitter or metallic aftertaste at high concentrations. Chemically, it's a sultam (C7H5NO3S), heat-stable, non-reactive with foods, and highly soluble in its sodium or calcium salt forms.
Uses include sweetening drinks, candies, baked goods, tobacco, and medicines to mask bitterness; it's frequently blended with ciclamati or aspartame for better taste in diet sodas.
Safety studies in the 1970s linked high doses to bladder cancer in rats via a crystal deposition mechanism irrelevant to humans; human epidemiological data show no cancer association. The IARC downgraded it to "not classifiable as carcinogenic" (Group 3). It has no calories, is safe for diabetics, but may cause reactions in those with sulfonamide allergies.
Regulatory status: Approved in the EU (E954) and Canada (ban lifted); in the US, a 1977 ban attempt failed, warning labels were required until 2000 when removed due to human safety evidence. It's prohibited for mailing in France. Controversies include the 1970s rat studies leading to labels, discovery credit disputes, and early US regulatory battles under the Pure Food and Drug Act.
Sucralose
Sucralose was discovered in 1976 by Tate & Lyle scientists collaborating with Queen Elizabeth College researchers during sucrose modification experiments. Patented in 1976, it gained approvals starting in Canada (1991), Australia (1993), US (1998), and EU (2004), now in over 80 countries.
It is about 600 times sweeter than sucrose, twice as sweet as saccarina, and three times sweeter than aspartame. Chemically, it's a chlorinated disaccharide (C12H19Cl3O8), stable at normal temperatures but may degrade above 120°C, releasing minor toxins. It's soluble in water and odorless.
Uses span candy, soft drinks, breakfast bars, and canned fruits; it's ideal for baking (though products may be drier) and safe for diabetics, with brands like Splenda containing bulking agents.
Safety reviews by FDA, WHO, and others confirm it's non-toxic and non-carcinogenic; most is excreted unchanged, with no impact on insulin or dental health. A 2023 WHO guideline advised against non-sugar sweeteners for weight control, but 2024 reviews found no risks even at high intake. A criticized rat study suggested gut microbiota effects, but not replicated in humans.
Regulatory status: Approved in US (ADI 15 mg/kg), EU (E955, ADI 5 mg/kg), Canada (ADI 9 mg/kg), and Australia/New Zealand. Controversies involve heating-related toxin concerns (needing more study) and industry-funded research debates on gut health, though overall deemed safe.
These additions provide balanced, evidence-based updates on these sweeteners, highlighting their benefits and any ongoing debates. If you have the original article text, I can refine the insertions further.
Sweeten Smartly for Holistic Health
The verdict? Brown sugar isn't the villain, but it's no hero either—just a tastier version of white with zero real health perks. That "dirty" comment? It's a fun way to highlight it's less refined, but don't let myths sway you. For true wellness, prioritize whole-food sweeteners and cut back overall to keep your energy balanced.
From my lens in energetic medicine and quantum healing, sugar imbalances can disrupt your body's subtle energies, leading to fatigue or mood swings. Try mindfulness practices or nature connections to crave less sweetness naturally! If you're exploring holistic swaps, check out my other posts on innovation and tradition for well-being.
What are your go-to sweeteners? Drop a comment below and share this if it surprised you—let's spread the truth! 💚
Â
Jasmine Angelique,
Naturopathic Doctor in Traditional Chinese Medicine, Best Quantum Healer in the USA in 2025 and Scientific Copywriter.
Â
Do you want to read other articles about the mind, medicine e metafisics?
Explore more on Jascotee.com and follow my blog for interesting research, wellbeing and conscience.
Sources
Brown Sugar vs. White Sugar: What's the Difference? - Healthline: https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/brown-sugar-vs-white-sugar
Â
Brown sugar vs. white sugar: Nutrition and cooking: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/brown-sugar-vs-white-sugar
Â
Effects of High White and Brown Sugar Consumption on Serum: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7789015/
Â
Are certain types of sugars healthier than others? - Harvard Health: https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/are-certain-types-of-sugars-healthier-than-others-2019052916699
Â
Antioxidant activity, nutritional and physicochemical characteristics...: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7500760/
Â
does brown sugar really heather then white? : r/HealthyFood - Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/HealthyFood/comments/u2zfwx/does_brown_sugar_really_heather_then_white/
Â
Which is Healthier: Brown Sugar vs White Sugar? - Redcliffe Labs: https://redcliffelabs.com/myhealth/food-creative/which-is-healthier-brown-sugar-vs-white-sugar/
Â
Brown Sugar vs. White Sugar: What's the Difference? - EatingWell: https://www.eatingwell.com/article/8005813/brown-sugar-vs-white-sugar-whats-the-difference/
Â
What's the Difference Between Natural and Refined Sugar?: https://www.cancercenter.com/community/blog/2022/10/natural-vs-refined-sugars-what-is-the-difference
Â
Nutritional Value - The Canadian Sugar Institute: https://sugar.ca/sugar-basics/frequently-asked-questions-about-sugar/nutritional-value
Â
Is brown sugar good for people with diabetes? - Vinmec: https://www.vinmec.com/eng/blog/is-brown-sugar-good-for-diabetics-en
Â
Brown sugar - Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_sugar
Â
Brown Sugar vs Granulated Sugar: Which is Healthier? - NOVI Health: https://novi-health.com/library/brown-sugar-vs-granulated-sugar
Â
Brown vs white sugar - what are the differences?: https://www.sugarnutritionresource.org/news-articles/brown-vs-white-sugar-what-are-the-differences
Â
Sources on Date Sugar
These focus on the nutritional profile, benefits like fiber and vitamins, and comparisons to other sugars.
Approaches to Enhance Sugar Content in Foods: Is the Date Palm...: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10778573/
Â
8 Proven Health Benefits of Dates - Healthline: https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/benefits-of-dates
Â
Effect of dates on blood glucose and lipid profile among patients...: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11229973/
Â
Nutritional, nutraceutical attributes, microbiological and chemical...: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666833524001278
Â
The Sweet Health Benefits of Dates: https://health.clevelandclinic.org/benefits-of-dates
Â
What are the benefits of date sugar over refined white sugar? - Quora: https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-benefits-of-date-sugar-over-refined-white-sugar
Â
Health Benefits of Date Sugar ( Khajur Jaggery): https://asmitaorganicfarm.com/blogs/aof/date-sugar-benefits
Â
Medjool Dates: Are There Health Benefits? - WebMD: https://www.webmd.com/diet/medjool-dates-health-benefits
Â
What About Date Sugar as a Sweetener? • AnswerLine • Iowa State...: https://blogs.extension.iastate.edu/answerline/2023/03/21/what-about-date-sugar-as-a-sweetener/
Â
Sources on Stevia
These cover safety, health effects, and studies on stevia as a zero-calorie sweetener.
Stevia Is Sweet — But Is It Good for You?: https://health.clevelandclinic.org/what-is-stevia
Â
Stevia, Nature's Zero-Calorie Sustainable Sweetener: A New Player...: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4890837/
Â
Stevia: Health Benefits and Risks - WebMD: https://www.webmd.com/food-recipes/what-is-stevia
Â
Erythritol, an ingredient in stevia, linked to heart attack and stroke...: https://www.cnn.com/2023/02/27/health/zero-calorie-sweetener-heart-attack-stroke-wellness
Â
Is Stevia Safe? The Truth About the "Healthy" Alternative - ACE Fitness: https://www.acefitness.org/certifiednewsarticle/1644/is-stevia-safe-the-truth-about-the-quot-healthy-quot-alternative/?srsltid=AfmBOoo_H6bBX8miXgqgsswrPQSpgjCn22xmPuKh9qnAjEtFCZ9nkfq8
Â
Natural Sweetener Stevia Makes a Gutsy Comeback - Tellus - USDA: https://tellus.ars.usda.gov/stories/articles/natural-sweetener-stevia-makes-a-gutsy-comeback
Â
Sweetener 'Stevia' does not alter gut microbiota composition...: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20240122/Sweetener-Stevia-does-not-alter-gut-microbiota-composition-confirms-new-study.aspx
Â
A review of stevia as a potential healthcare product: Up-to-date...: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0924224420305525
Â
Are 'Natural' Sweeteners Healthier Than Sugar? | University Hospitals: https://www.uhhospitals.org/blog/articles/2022/08/are-natural-sweeteners-healthier-than-sugar
Â
Sources on Whole Fruits (Natural Sugars)
These explain why natural sugars in fruits are healthier due to fiber, vitamins, and lower health risks compared to added sugars.
Sugar in fruits: What matters for health | University Health Center: https://health.unl.edu/sugar-fruits-what-matters-health/
Â
What's the difference between natural and refined sugars?: https://www.mdanderson.org/cancerwise/natural-versus-refined-sugar--what-s-the-difference.h00-159465579.html
Â
The difference between natural and added sugars - Welia Health: https://www.weliahealth.org/2024/07/the-difference-between-natural-and-added-sugars/
Â
Sugar 101 | American Heart Association: https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/healthy-eating/eat-smart/sugar/sugar-101
Â
Fruit versus sugar, a sweet benefit - Food & Health: https://www.canr.msu.edu/news/fruit_versus_sugar_a_sweet_benefit
Â
Ask a Dietitian- Is Sugar in Fruit Bad? - Quincy Medical Group: https://www.quincymedgroup.com/health-topic/ask-a-dietitian-is-sugar-in-fruit-bad
Â
Distinct Impact of Natural Sugars from Fruit Juices and Added...: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8468124/
Â
Are certain types of sugars healthier than others? - Harvard Health: https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/are-certain-types-of-sugars-healthier-than-others-2019052916699
Â
Understanding the “Sweet Stuff” – Natural vs Added Sugars: https://www.augustahealth.com/2022/11/understanding-the-sweet-stuff-natural-vs-added-sugars/
Â
Sources on Honey
These compare raw honey's benefits (antioxidants, nutrients) to regular sugar.
Honey and Diabetes: The Importance of Natural Simple Sugars in...: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5817209/
Â
Honey vs. sugar: Differences, benefits, and disadvantages: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/317728
Â
A Comprehensive Review of the Effect of Honey on Human Health: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10346535/
Â
Is Honey a Healthy Alternative to Sugar - FEPBlue: https://www.fepblue.org/news/2023/07/20/15/38/Is-Honey-a-Healthy-Alternative-to-Sugar
Â
Honey Versus Sugar-Which is Healthier?: https://www.uaex.uada.edu/counties/miller/news/fcs/herbs-spices/Honey%2520Versus%2520Sugar-Which%2520is%2520Healthier.aspx
Â
Is honey good for you? 7 health benefits of honey: https://www.bswhealth.com/blog/the-bittersweet-truth-about-honeys-health-benefits
Â
Honey as an alternative to sugar? New study indicates the health...: https://nypost.com/2023/01/09/honey-as-an-alternative-to-sugar-new-study-indicates-the-health-benefits/
Â
Honey vs. Sugar: Which Sweetener Should I Use? - Healthline: https://www.healthline.com/health/food-nutrition/honey-vs-sugar
Â
Is Honey Better Than Sugar? Here's What the Science Says - Noom: https://www.noom.com/blog/nutrition/honey-healthier-than-sugar/?srsltid=AfmBOoqL378lQcKa2RvmKk_z6qNrYzH5xgSFFvP4aJfbCwAPZ3msGin2
Â
Honey: Is it the same as eating sugar? | The Doctor's Kitchen: https://www.thedoctorskitchen.com/learn/honey-is-it-the-same-as-eating-sugar
Â
Sources on Maple Syrup
These highlight antioxidants, minerals, and potential benefits as a sweetener.
Maple Syrup: Healthy or Unhealthy? - Healthline: https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/maple-syrup
Â
Nutritional, pharmacological, and sensory properties of maple syrup: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10469071/
Â
Maple Syrup: Is It Good for You? - WebMD: https://www.webmd.com/diet/maple-syrup-good-for-you
Â
Is maple syrup the next sweetener substitute? Comparing the...: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666154325001000
Â
The Sweet Secrets of Maple Syrup | BlueCross BlueShield of Vermont: https://www.bluecrossvt.org/health-community/blog/listing/sweet-secrets-maple-syrup
Â
Is maple syrup the ultimate natural sweetener? Researchers say it's...: https://www.news-medical.net/news/20230914/Is-maple-syrup-the-ultimate-natural-sweetener-Researchers-say-its-more-than-just-tasty%21.aspx
Â
Are 'Natural' Sweeteners Healthier Than Sugar? | University Hospitals: https://www.uhhospitals.org/blog/articles/2022/08/are-natural-sweeteners-healthier-than-sugar
Â
Maple Syrup vs. Honey: Which Natural Sweetener Is Better for You?: https://www.verywellhealth.com/maple-syrup-vs-honey-11754040
Â
Is Maple Syrup Better for You Than Sugar?: https://health.clevelandclinic.org/is-maple-syrup-better-for-you-than-sugar
Â
Sources on Coconut Sugar
These compare it to brown sugar, noting lower GI and minerals.
What You Have Know : Coconut Sugar VS Brown Sugar: https://indococonutsugar.com/what-you-have-know-coconut-sugar-vs-brown-sugar/
Â
6 Benefits of Using Coconut Palm Sugar (vs. White & Brown Sugar): https://www.znaturalfoods.com/blogs/articles/6-benefits-of-using-coconut-palm-sugar-vs-white-brown-sugar
Â
What Is The Difference Between Coconut Sugar and Brown Sugar: https://maithaandtreats.com/blogs/news/what-is-the-difference-between-coconut-sugar-and-brown-sugar
Â
Coconut Sugar: A Healthy Sugar Alternative or a Big, Fat Lie?: https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/coconut-sugar
Â
Which is better: Coconut sugar vs brown sugar vs jaggery vs regular...: https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/life-style/food-news/coconut-sugar-vs-brown-sugar-vs-jaggery-vs-regular-sugar/articleshow/109169867.cms
Â
What is the difference in coconut sugar and brown sugar? Any taste...: https://www.reddit.com/r/nutrition/comments/tku7n0/what_is_the_difference_in_coconut_sugar_and_brown/
Â
Coconut Sugar vs Brown Sugar: A Detailed Comparison: https://www.sattvicfoods.in/blogs/news/coconut-sugar-vs-brown-sugar-a-detailed-comparison
Â
Coconut Sugar: Are There Health Benefits? - WebMD: https://www.webmd.com/diet/health-benefits-coconut-sugar
Â
CANE SUGAR VS COCONUT SUGAR VS BROWN SUGAR: https://www.myloveearth.com/blog/cane-sugar-vs-coconut-sugar-vs-brown-sugar?srsltid=AfmBOoozkfo4amC5CsJzSgcCzf98xmQJ5KMnm8kYE57j4bksc24Y5GE3
Â
Sources on Monk Fruit Sweetener
These discuss its zero-calorie nature, potential benefits, and studies.
Bibliometric analysis on the literature of monk fruit extract and...: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10495570/
Â
Monk Fruit Sweetener: Good or Bad? - Healthline: https://www.healthline.com/nutrition/monk-fruit-sweetener
Â
Is Monk Fruit a Healthy Sweetener?: https://health.clevelandclinic.org/why-you-should-use-monk-fruit-sweetener
Â
Stevia & Monk Fruit Sweeteners: https://cris.msu.edu/news/sweetener/stevia-monk-fruit-sweeteners/
Â
Monk Fruit Extract and Sustainable Health: A PRISMA-Guided...: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40362742/
Â
Monk Fruit: 4 Benefits, Nutrition, and Risks - Health: https://www.health.com/monk-fruit-benefits-7494675
Â
Monk Fruit Extract and Sustainable Health: A PRISMA-Guided...: https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/9/1433
Â
Recent advancements in mogrosides: A review on biological...: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0308814624009269
Â
What to Know About Monk Fruit Sugar - WebMD: https://www.webmd.com/diet/what-to-know-about-monk-fruit-sugar
Â
Â
CYCLAMATES (Group 3) - Overall Evaluations of Carcinogenicity
URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK533628/
Excerpt: "The evidence that the risk of cancer is increased among users of artificial sweeteners is inconsistent." (Discusses inadequate but suggestive human evidence for carcinogenicity.)
Â
[PDF] Cyclamate, Commissioner's Decision, 45 FR 61474
URL: https://www.fda.gov/files/food/published/Cyclamates-45FR61474-1980-09-16-%2528PDF%2529.pdf
Published: Sep 16, 2024 (original from 1980)
Excerpt: "The evidence of positive carcinogenicity is not overwhelming, but it is suggestive that they are sensitive to carcinogenic insult by cyclamates."
Â
Cyclamates (IARC Summary & Evaluation, Volume 22, 1980)
URL: https://www.inchem.org/documents/iarc/vol22/cyclamates.html
Published: Sep 30, 1999
Excerpt: "There is evidence that they can promote bladder tumors in rats."
Â
Safety of cyclamate as sugar substitute, more than 100 countries
URL: https://www.cyclamate.org/regulatorystatus.html
Excerpt: "In 1970, following the results of a controversial study in which rats given extremely high doses of cyclamate and other substances developed bladder tumors."
Â
Saccarine
Carcinogenicity of saccharin - PMC
URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1637197/
Excerpt: "Saccharin is carcinogenic for the urinary bladder in rats and mice, and most likely is carcinogenic in human beings."
Â
Artificial Sweeteners and Cancer - NCI
URL: https://www.cancer.gov/about-cancer/causes-prevention/risk/diet/artificial-sweeteners-fact-sheet
Published: Aug 29, 2023
Excerpt: "Laboratory studies have linked saccharin at high doses with the development of bladder cancer in rats."
Â
Artificial sweeteners and cancer: 7 things to know
URL: https://www.mdanderson.org/cancerwise/artificial-sweeteners-and-cancer--7-things-to-know.h00-159620223.html
Published: Jul 18, 2023
Excerpt: "Saccharin was placed on the list of cancer-causing chemicals by the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in the late 1970s or early 1980s."
Â
Aspartame and Other Sweeteners in Food - FDA
URL: https://www.fda.gov/food/food-additives-petitions/aspartame-and-other-sweeteners-food
Published: Feb 27, 2025
Excerpt: "In the early 1970s, saccharin was linked with the development of bladder cancer in laboratory rats."
Â
Smoldering Battle Over Saccharin Heats Up | Science | AAAS
URL: https://www.science.org/content/article/smoldering-battle-over-saccharin-heats
Excerpt: "Saccharin came under suspicion in the 1970s when studies found it caused bladder cancer in male rats fed piles of sodium saccharin."
Â
[PDF] EVIDENCE ON THE CARCINOGENICITY OF SODIUM SACCHARIN
URL: https://oehha.ca.gov/sites/default/files/media/downloads/crnr/hidnasacc.pdf
Published: Oct 1, 2002
Excerpt: "Numerous epidemiology studies have investigated the relationship between artificial sweeteners and bladder cancer risk."
Â
Sucralose
Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: Results from the NutriNet
URL: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8946744/
Excerpt: "Sucralose was shown to increase the risk of malignant tumours and hematopoietic neoplasia in mice."
Â
Sucralose: Sweetener May Damage DNA and Increase Cancer Risk
URL: https://www.healthline.com/health-news/sucralose-a-common-artificial-sweetener-may-increase-cancer-risk
Published: Jun 13, 2023
Excerpt: "The study found that sucralose may lead to a leaky gut lining, and increase the activity of genes related to inflammation and cancer."
Â
Artificial Sweeteners and Cancer: Aspartame, Erythritol, Stevia & More
URL: https://www.cancercenter.com/risk-factors/artificial-sweeteners-cancer
Published: Aug 2, 2023
Excerpt: "In 2016, concerns emerged after a new study suggested that mice may be at greater risk of blood cancer after consuming high doses of sucralose."
Â
New Research with Mice Reveals the Dangers of Sucralose and...
URL: https://www.kentscientific.com/blog/new-research-with-mice-reveals-the-dangers-of-sweeteners/?srsltid=AfmBOoq4xHUGnc3fmQDV3E7IXHt2cRMGqODKteYXbMDGXHYQQT1Purgb
Published: Jul 28, 2023
Excerpt: "When the researchers exposed human blood cells to sucralose-6-acetate, they found that it damages DNA, which could increase the risk for cancer."
Â
An integrative analysis reveals cancer risk associated with artificial...
URL: https://translational-medicine.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12967-024-06047-0
Published: Jan 8, 2025
Excerpt: "Sucralose has been reported to increase colorectal cancer risk in a murine model."
Â
Common artificial sweetener may cause DNA damage, cancer
URL: https://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/a-chemical-found-in-common-artificial-sweetener-may-cause-dna-damage-cancer
Excerpt: "New research suggests that sucralose-6-acetate, a chemical found in artificial sweeteners, is 'genotoxic,' meaning it could cause DNA damage."